Building large structures in orbit — solar power stations, platforms, depots — comes down to area, mass, launch flights, and capital cost. This builder turns a target capability into those four numbers so you can judge the scale and cost of an orbital project.
It is a quick sizing companion for anyone reasoning about space-based solar power or orbital construction at scale.
Delivered power depends on array area and the efficiency and losses of operating in orbit, so effective megawatts is always lower than nameplate. Mass follows from area and areal density, and flights follow from mass divided by per-flight payload.
Capital cost combines hardware and launch, and because launch is a large share, the model shows how cheaper flights or lighter arrays move the total — the same levers that decide whether orbital solar can compete with ground power.
A gigawatt-class orbital array spans several square kilometres, weighs enough to need dozens of heavy-lift flights, and carries a capital cost dominated by launch — which is exactly why falling launch cost is the pivot for space-based solar power.
Nameplate peak power minus orbital losses and efficiency gives the effective delivered power.
Launch mass, delivered in per-flight chunks, usually dominates schedule and cost.
No — it's an order-of-magnitude figure for comparison, with adjustable assumptions.
It focuses on the orbital segment; pair it with the energy scaling tool for the full picture.
25 languages, runs entirely in-browser.